​​​National data check-up site ​for Estonia regarding Open sea assessment and Coastal assessment.

National contact: Fill check-up table below according to EUTRO OPER manual based on the data described in dataview.


  
  
  
  
Description of exceptions
Actions
Yes
  
YesYes

Most of the Estonian monitoring observations, besides open sea stations in February and June 2007, are missing. There are more data for 2007 and definitely there are data for years 2008-2012. The problem is that these data are not reported to the HELCOM-ICES database by data provider: Estonian Marine Institute. ​ So far the reason for not updating the data have been due to the ICES data formats... ​The collected data for years 2008-2012 are available in the EIONET database – could ICES download the data and include these to the ICES database by themselves? ​​​​

Estonia will report the data, and it will be included into the assessment if reported by 12 Dec​

No
  
YesNo
No
  
YesNo
No
  
YesNo
  
  
  
  
Description of exceptions
Actions
Yes
  
YesYes

Phytoplankton biomass 6-9: EST_8 and EST_9 do not have enough data for the period 2007-2012  - according to the map these areas are coloured. ​

In the basins where no value for 2007-2012 was provided, the period 2001-2006 was used. No changes made.​

No
  
YesNo
Yes
  
YesYes

TN 6-9: EST_014 should not have value as there aren't enough data for period 2007-2012, the value used at the present is for period 2001-2006

TP 6-9: EST_014 should not have value as there aren't enough data for period 2007-2012, the value used at the present is for period 2001-2006

​Phyto BM 6-9:  EST_003, EST_008 and EST_009 should not have values as there aren't enough data for period 2007-2012, the values used at the present are for period 2001-2006

In the basins where no value for 2007-2012 was provided, the period 2001-2006 was used. No changes made.​

No
  
YesNo
Yes
  
YesYes

TN 6-9: EST_014 should not have value as there aren't enough data for ES value for period 2007-2012, the value used at the resent is for period 2001-2006

TP 6-9: EST_014 should not have value as there aren't enough data for ES value for period 2007-2012, the value used at the present is for period 2001-2006​

In the basins where no value for 2007-2012 was provided, the period 2001-2006 was used. No changes made.​

No
  
YesNo
  
  
  
  
Description of exceptions
Actions
No
  
YesNo
Yes
  
YesYes

​EST_003: Direct effects should have 3 indicators – there aren't enough data of phytoplankton BM for the period 2007-2012 .

EST_008: Direct effects should be 3 indicators – there aren't enough data of phytoplankton BM for the period 2007-2012.

EST_009: Direct effects should be 3 indicators – there aren't enough data of phytoplankton BM for the period 2007-2012.

EST_014: Nutrient levels shouldn’t have indicators (for TN and TP there aren’t enough data for the period 2007-2012)​.

In the basins where no value for 2007-2012 was provided, the period 2001-2006 was used. No changes made.​
Yes
  
YesYes

​EST_003: Direct effects ER value should be 1,23 as Direct effects should have 3 indicators – there aren't enough data of phytoplankton BM for the period 2007-2012 .

EST_008: Direct effects ER value should be 2,34 as Direct effects should have 3 indicators – there aren't enough data of phytoplankton BM for the period 2007-2012.

EST_009: Direct effects ER value should be 2,45 as Direct effects should have 3 indicators – there aren't enough data of phytoplankton BM for the period 2007-2012.

EST_014: Nutrient levels shouldn’t have the indicators and ER value (for TN and TP there aren’t enough data for the period 2007-2012)​.


In the basins where no value for 2007-2012 was provided, the period 2001-2006 was used. No changes made.​
Yes
  
YesYes

​EST_003: Status value should be 1,23 as the Direct effects ER value should be 1,23 as Direct effects should have 3 indicators – there aren’t enough data of phytoplankton BM for the period 2007-2012.

EST_008: Status value should be 3,06 as the Direct effects ER value should be 2,34 as Direct effects should have 3 indicators – there aren’t enough data of phytoplankton BM for the period 2007-2012.

EST_009: Status value should be 2,45 as the Direct effects ER value should be 2,45 as Direct effects should have 3 indicators – there aren’t enough data of phytoplankton BM for the period 2007-2012.

EST_014: Nutrient levels shouldn’t have the indicators and ER value (for TN and TP there aren’t enough data for the period 2007-2012)​.


In the basins where no value for 2007-2012 was provided, the period 2001-2006 was used. No changes made.​
No
  
YesNo